/ardd-backlog¶
Tier: core
Log a feature idea to the per-feature register (.project/features/) — no artifact edits yet; bugs and UX problems with existing behavior belong in /ardd-feedback instead.
Usage¶
/ardd-backlog <plain-language description of the capability>
/ardd-backlog --from-artifacts # retroactive sweep of stable artifacts
/ardd-backlog --assign-epics # re-runnable epic-grouping sweep
Logging is deliberately cheap: one register file, no artifact edits, no
design work. The design happens later, when you target the slug with
/ardd-plan <slug> — in any order, whenever you choose. Substantial or
decision-reversing ideas should be vetted with /ardd-research first.
--from-artifacts is the retroactive sweep: it walks every
status: stable artifact, proposes candidate entries for
documented-but-untracked capabilities (grounded in specific artifact
passages, deduplicated against the whole register including
implemented/retired slugs), confirms them in one batched
multi-select prompt, and creates the approved ones through the normal
feature-create path. It's a proposal list — the human decides;
declined candidates are dropped, not recorded. /ardd-status's
"Documented but untracked" section points here.
--assign-epics is a re-runnable sweep that proposes epic: groupings
across the register: it walks every feature whose epic field is
empty (regardless of status), proposes thematic groupings by judgment
grounded in each entry's description/Why: line (never invented), and
confirms every proposed group in one batched multi-select prompt —
same discipline as --from-artifacts. Accepted groups are applied via
ardd-state.sh feature-field <slug> epic <value>; declined groups are
dropped. epic: values feed feature-list.sh --epic and
/ardd-status's by-epic breakdown.
Reads¶
.project/features/— slug collision check
Writes¶
.project/features/<slug>.md— created viaardd-state.sh feature-create <slug>(which writes the frontmatter:slug,status: backlogged,logged: <date>). The body is one sentence on what the capability does from the user's perspective, plus an optionalWhy:line for non-obvious context.
Behavior notes¶
- Mirror check: if the description is really a complaint about
existing behavior (a bug, UX friction, "works but shouldn't work that
way"), it offers to capture it as
/ardd-feedbackinstead. - Slug wording is judgment (short capability-level noun phrase); the
sanitization is deterministic (
ardd-state.sh slug), with a 4-char hex suffix on collision. - A legacy single-file
.project/artifacts/features.mdmeans the install predates the per-feature migration — it tells you to re-run install.sh rather than appending to the legacy file. - Ends by running
/ardd-statusto refresh the backlog count.
Related¶
/ardd-feedback— observations about existing behavior/ardd-research— vet a substantial idea before it earns an entry/ardd-plan <slug>— where the logged idea's design work happens/ardd-init— its existing-codebase path offers a one-time bulk register extraction; this skill logs single new ideas going forward